|
||
![]() |
Bronze
Age 2000 - 700 BC |
|
Return to Ring-ditches and roundbarrows of Thanet Display Contents Ring-ditches and roundbarrows of Thanet - Section 1 Link - Extract from an RCHME report on The classification of cropmarks in Kent |
Ring-ditches and
roundbarrows of Thanet - Section 1 Link - Extract from an RCHME report ![]() Photographer unknown |
|
A transcript of the text | The
classification of cropmarks in Kent by Mr. Jonathan Edis |
|
9.1 Thanet |
||
The light, chalky soils of Thanet are
particularly good for
producing cropmarks, but the modern landscape has biased our
information considerably. the massive coastal resorts of Ramsgate and
Margate are now almost completely unresponsive to cropmark formation,
and Manston Aerodrome, situated on high ground in the middle of the
Island, has restricted the scope of aerial reconnaissance.
Nevertheless, Thanet is one of the two best regions for studying
cropmarks in Kent, and is of special interest because it was separated
from the mainland by a tidal estuary until at least the 11th century AD
(Hill 1981).
|
||
With two
possible long barrows and seven possible henges, there is plenty of
scope for suggesting that Thanet was an important focus in the early
prehistoric period. It also contains a very high density of
Bronze Age barrows, some of which form the largest known cemeteries in
Kent. There is also good reason to believe that its share of
'Bronze Age' and 'early Iron Age' enclosed settlements was equal to
anywhere else in Kent on present evidence.
|
||
There is evidence of denser enclosed
settlement in the late
Iron Age and early Roman period: interestingly, the north east of the
island appears to have been reserved as a massive cemetary during the
Bronze Age, to become heavily settled during the Iron Age.
|
||
Later Roman influence appears to have
concentrated in the
north-west of the island, near the fort at Reculver, and some of the
Bronze Age barrow cemeteries may have acted as foci for pagan Saxon
barrows.
|
||
Despite its dense settlement, Thanet
does not have the same density of ditched trackways that are found in
south east Kent. This may be due to different farming practices
(ditched droveways may not have been needed), but it is also possible
that the present road system may be of considerable antiquity: up to
one third of enclosures provisionally dated to the late Iron Age/Roman
periods appear to have been bisected by modern roads, or appear to be
associated with them closely. If the dating is correct, then the
relationship is surely too high to be a coincidence: it implies that
some of Thanet's modern roads have late prehistoric origins.
|
||
|
||
RCHME - Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of England. |
||
Bibliography Edis J. 1989. The classification of cropmarks in Kent. A report for the monuments protection programme. Air Photography Unit. Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of England. July 1989. |
||
The text is a transcript of that written by Mr. Jonathan Edis. The photographs are by the author unless otherwise stated. | ||
Paul
Hart Version 1 - Posted 10.08.06 Version 2 - Posted 21.10.06 |
||
All
content © Trust for Thanet Archaeology
|