|
||
![]() |
The Beaker Period 2500 - 1700 BC | |
Return to Beaker burials of Thanet - Part 2 Display Contents Beaker burials of Thanet - Part 2 Link - Significance Artefact scales in centimetre divisions |
Beaker burials of Thanet -
Part 2 Link - Significance ![]() Excavating and sampling the North Foreland Beaker burial |
|
It appears that the Isle of Thanet
has a significant share of |
||
The trend is echoed in Thanet's large
number of roundbarrows, a statistic which
appears significant not just on a regional but also a national level.
An Island-wide average of 9.11 roundbarrows per sq km has recently been
estimated (see the Roundbarrows Display in the Bronze Age Gallery). In
reality this is likely to be a
minimum figure, as many more such monuments will remain undetected or
have been destroyed.
|
||
T
|
||
![]() North Foreland Beaker |
It
should be remembered that the Beaker vessels are most
likely to have been manufactured locally, but inspired by the forms of
the
continental
pots. Alex Gibson suggests that, despite their quality, the
techniques of their manufacture ‘are well within the capabilities of
competent potters’ (Gibson
2002).
If so then perhaps they could have been
copied more widely and thus should be more common than they are
traditionally held to be.
|
|
|
This certainly appears to be the case in
Thanet,
for the occurrences of Beaker pots and sherds
far exceed the number of other contemporary ceramics which have been
recovered so far.
Little Late Neolithic Grooved Ware has been found in Thanet, numbering no more than a handful of small sherds; with a similar amount recorded from Early Bronze Age Urns and Food Vessels. |
|
![]() Collared Urn from Lord of the Manor Site III |
The first Urn to be discovered came from within the inner ditch of a double-ditched roundbarrow that Howard Hurd excavated at Valetta House (now Bradstow School) in 1911 (Hurd 1913; Minter and Herbert 1973). The rarity of these
vessels is probably due to the
majority being inserted into the mounds of roundbarrows
which have subsequently been
ploughed flat.
|
|
Miniature Collared Urn from North Foreland Avene |
Only one ‘Pygmy Cup’ or Perforated Accessory Vessel has been found; recovered from a burial at Lord of the Manor. Sherds representing two Food Vessels are known from burials at Lord of the Manor and South Dumpton Down. These represent two thirds of Kent's current total (Gibson in Perkins 2004). These examples do not include the two pots recovered as grave-goods from the KARU barrow excavations. Their nature is still uncertain, though they are likely to be Early Bronze Age grave-goods. |
|
Our interpretation of burial Beakers as prestigious objects and status-symbols is reinforced by the other high-quality
grave-goods which are often associated with Beaker inhumations. These occur in less than half of the Thanet examples. When they do, they are
generally rather special or even unique local items.
|
||
![]() North Foreland Beaker |
A measure of the exclusivity and status
of Thanet’s Beaker burials could perhaps
be gained
if they were compared with other contemporary Late Neolithic and Early
Bronze Age graves. Comparing
the information from Beaker-producing and Beaker-less burials of the
same period has the potential to give us an insight into the
contexts in which these vessels were used. Dr. David Perkins (1999) has suggested that the roundbarrow rite itself may have been the preserve of a social elite. Those interred within probably represent only a fraction of Thanet’s Early Bronze Age population; given the amount of manpower needed to construct the monuments in the first place. Flat-graves are much simpler structures, but as yet do not appear to occur frequently enough to account for the missing population. They are difficult to identify through aerial photography (but not impossible; Anglo-Saxon cemetaries can show very well) though of course they are un-dateable by this approach. |
|
The method of disposal of the remains of those people who did not receive a roundbarrow or flat-grave burial can only be guessed at. Are the different rites indicative of a differing status within the community (perhaps how much manpower could be commanded), or just an alternative cultural view (and religious belief) about the disposal of the dead? | ||
The high proportion of the Isle's Beaker burials which occur as flat-graves may seem to contradict the idea of a status-orientated interment. As upstanding monuments these would have been far less impressive than a roundbarrow, even if they had been marked above ground in some way. | ||
![]() Later activity at Lord of the Manor Painting by Len Jay |
Perhaps
Beaker burials had less to do with displaying status to the deceased’s
contemporaries and more to do with a system of tributes for or to an
afterlife.
The trend of a ‘Beaker-led’
refurbishment phase at many (long-abandoned?) Late Neolithic ceremonial
sites may hint at a
spiritual dimension to their story.
|
|
The text is the responsibility of the author; the photographs are by the author unless otherwise stated. | ||
Paul Hart Version 1 - Posted 07.05.06 Version 2 - Posted 13.06.06 Version 3 - Posted 21.07.06 Version 4 - Posted 16.12.06 |
||
All
content © Trust for Thanet Archaeology
|